Aroka responded to the municipality and gave signs to the “so-called ‘leaders'”.

Aroka reacted “angrily” to the municipality’s allegation about the use of the stadium

Aroca defended itself in opposition to accusations made by the metropolis council, which blamed Pratica for stopping the use of the stadium’s car parking zone for the Feira das Colhetas.

The membership held that the municipality couldn’t impose the “use of the stadium” with out “minimal communication or session” with its “tenants” and that the municipality’s preliminary goal was “to maintain a live performance”, “with out guaranteeing supervision and in the connected safety and bogs and different services”. Permission to entry”.

“Aruca, in good religion and in good time, knowledgeable that the switch of the web site is not going to be attainable for causes of safety and for the planning of coaching and preparation of video games to take part in the I Liga. Because the use of the stadium is just not suitable with the use as a municipal automobile park for sports activities, cultural or leisure occasions solely” , the notice reads.

The membership claimed that it had tried to get the metropolis council’s help for the crucial funding for the stadium, imposed by the Portuguese Professional Football League, the Portuguese Institute of Sports and Youth (IPJD) and UEFA, “at all times met with a adverse response”.

“Since the finish of the membership, in the final two years, the municipality could have to perform finances works of greater than 100,000 euros, protected by the phrases of the task settlement. The stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and municipalities. It is compulsory to adjust to it, impose it and get rid of it as it’s handy. “Can’t, neglect that they don’t have any proper to get rid of the stadium as it’s on lease,” he defined.

Around midday, the municipality defined that “GNR was compelled to name the municipal stadium to reduce the padlocks stopping entry to the automobile park, which is its property and has full authority.” The administrators “applied the menace” if “the municipality didn’t full the set of duties claimed by the membership”.

“The Aroca leaders, who have been informed by the municipality on August 10 about the intention to use the stadium inside the scope of the Fera das Colhetas (automobile park and precinct), confirmed themselves to be unavailable to adjust to the guidelines said in the contract.”, he says. Statement of Municipality.

Additionally, the Aroca City Council said that in the lease settlement for the stadium, the membership is “obliged to help the group of occasions organized by the municipality” and “has the proper as the proprietor of the gear” to use it, arguing that “so long as the use doesn’t battle with the membership’s commitments relating to sporting occasions”. Because there aren’t any video games in the skilled league this weekend due to the stoppage for the nationwide groups.

Declaration

Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda grew to become conscious of the content material of the assertion made right now by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the information recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable issues and accusations of advantage. And the ideas of FC Aroka leaders.

Thus, in opposition to our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the public to clarify the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the proper to use the municipal stadium and its integral elements that embrace the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in power and our obligations are all up to date.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted the use of the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was said in the failed communication, regardless of the possession of the municipality, it’s not in full possession of the proprietor’s rights, being encumbered. With proper of use of Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, beneath the phrases and circumstances outlined in the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can not impose its use with out at the least speaking or consulting with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures should be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that they might set up a live performance in the stadium premises, with out guaranteeing the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the bogs and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be attainable due to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of knowledgeable nature. Portuguese League.

9 – We have been stunned that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the location of the occasion, however at all times positive that frequent sense will prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the sport between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , that means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the firm in query acknowledged the validity of our considerations and refused to set the stage on the eve of a high-risk sport.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that the use of the stadium for concert events will intervene with the regular coaching and planning of the skilled soccer workforce, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After persistent insistence, we managed to have a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nonetheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of, after all, he has thought of our soccer membership and its leaders, that is the scenario. It definitely would not have occurred.

14 – In that assembly, we clearly and clearly defined, at all times in good religion, the the explanation why we weren’t allowed to maintain the occasion at the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental impact of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we grew to become conscious of a change in the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It occurs that we’re as soon as once more stunned by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality relating to the use of the parking house of the stadium, ignoring the considerations and wants already expressed by the membership and the phrases of the switch settlement. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for the realization of sports activities, cultural or leisure occasions, not suitable with the use as a carpark, in addition to the disturbance and battle attributable to the already deliberate coaching and video games due to this use. .

19 – We have our mayors who’re good folks, who obey the legislation and the obligations assumed in the contract, and we’ve got at all times asserted the want for the dwelling forces of the area to work collectively to reward our village and area.

20 – Therefore, we’ve got tried a number of occasions to get the help of the municipality in the crucial investments and enhancements in the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), at all times with a adverse response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up finances works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, beneath the phrases of the task contract, beneath the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being sure to adjust to it, can not impose or get rid of the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to get rid of the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas about the appropriateness and respect for the perspective of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the majority of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In truth, FC Arouca is right now a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive method to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced so much to its city, primarily due to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted assets. which has no help from the municipality.

Being good folks, respecting and abiding by the legislation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation at the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality, which culminated in the dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as a little bit democratic sense and frequent sense would have sufficed to keep away from this. The entire scenario.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans get pleasure from the Harvest Fair to the better of their potential.

so referred to as “leaders”

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.