(Motorsport-Total.com) – Debate over Formula 1’s automobile security guidelines reignited at the Italian Grand Prix, with the race not restarting after Daniel Ricciardo suffered a technical failure and ended the race after 5 laps. end line behind the security automobile.
© Motorsport Images
The Italian Grand Prix ended behind the security automobile amid fan protests
Although race officers had been strict with the guidelines this time round – in contrast to final 12 months’s last-lap restart in Abu Dhabi that determined the championship – followers had been left with a bitter style of their mouths as the race was flagged for lack of a inexperienced end.
Red Bull crew principal Christian Horner stated he believed the race ought to have been red-flagged to make sure at the very least one lap was accomplished and the race was not completed underneath the security automobile.
Horner was outraged by the “banal incident.”
“Personally, I’m dissatisfied as a result of I really feel the security automobile caught the fallacious automobile after which every part was postponed as a result of it was a really minor incident,” stated the Red Bull crew boss.
“The automobile wasn’t in the fence or something. We all the time talked about how no person needs to complete the race with the security automobile. I felt there was sufficient time to restart the race. The race circumstances are higher than the security automobile.”
McLaren crew boss Andreas Seidl says Formula 1 groups did not agree on a plan to forestall races from ending underneath the security automobile throughout discussions following the Abu Dhabi row final 12 months.
Seidl: “Couldn’t agree on a greater resolution”
“After final 12 months’s incident in Abu Dhabi, there was plenty of dialogue between the FIA, Formula 1 and all the taking part groups to see how the guidelines could be modified to make sure that races by no means finish with no protected automobile,” Seidl defined afterwards. competitors.
“But though the FIA and Formula 1 pushed us all to discover a resolution, it was as much as us as a crew, however we could not agree on a greater resolution that was additionally honest from a sporting viewpoint. That’s why I’m sorry, now we have to confess that such conditions can occur.”
Ending the race on yellow: is it an answer?
Interview: Formula 1 ought to flip to America to keep away from a Monza-like farce, says analyst Mark Surer. More Formula 1 Videos
Seidl says the FIA and Formula 1 have “actually tried every part” to discover a method to change the guidelines so races are all the time green-flagged, however groups have expressed too many considerations that the sport is positioned above the sporting facet.
“We simply need a determination that is honest from a sporting standpoint and does not come as a sudden menace,” Seidl stated. “That’s why we could not agree on something higher than what now we have now. In the finish, we voted to maintain the guidelines as they’re. I keep in mind each crew voted that approach. So I feel, shut this factor down.”
Horner Scissors: Could have been two rounds
For Horner, the drawback at Monza was not on account of the guidelines, however to a poorly timed security automobile process: “I feel it may have been mounted in time to be sincere. It was a case of the fallacious automobile. [George Russell] obtained”.
“The security automobile could not catch the chief, which triggered an enormous delay, so the leaders needed to catch up, after which the area automobiles needed to catch up. I feel you are able to do at the very least one lap of the race. Even two.”
“You can all the time study one thing, but it surely goes towards the ideas we mentioned and it isn’t good to complete the race underneath the security automobile,” Horner stated. “If they knew they weren’t going to win it, they need to have put up a purple flag and restarted the race, however clearly that wasn’t the case.”
The FIA is contemplating adjustments to security automobile rules
FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem held a summit at Monza after the race on Monday with race officers and Formula 1 crew managers to debate a variety of sporting points, with site visitors security rules prone to be mentioned.
One potential option to make sure that the race all the time ends with a inexperienced flag is to jot down into the guidelines that an automated purple flag ought to be proven if the security automobile is required to be a sure distance from the finish.
Ending the race behind the security automobile, is that essential? Yes!
We check out the rulebook and clarify why crossing the end line underneath yellow was not an option at the Italian Grand Prix in Monza. More Formula 1 Videos
When requested about the proposal, Alpine sporting director Alan Perman stated it sounded “unbelievable” however would inevitably have “unintended penalties”. “But it is occurred earlier than, we did it in Baku final 12 months and it went properly,” says Permane.
Permane: Monza race end was ‘unlucky’
“I feel you possibly can write that into the guidelines. It’s not affordable. I’m positive there’s going to be one thing we do not like, however we’re right here to placed on a present. And [der Zieleinlauf in Monza] It is obvious that it can’t be accepted.”
“It’s not an ideally suited end, no person needs to complete underneath the security automobile. It’s pathetic for the followers, actually pathetic. We did not do every part we may, that is for positive. But perhaps we need not go 50 kilometers each time. If the security automobile comes out earlier than the end, wave a purple flag. Maybe we’d like to ensure we have the security automobile procedures proper and we’re engaged on getting them in control.”
“The drawback is that later in the race you will have these automobiles in the security automobile intervals,” explains Permane. “We’ve had limitless discussions about how one can enhance this example, and altering this course of has many unintended penalties.”