The Ball – Arouka responds to Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian perspective” (Arouka)

“Football Club de Aroca, SDUQ LDA was conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Aroca with shock and anger.” Arauca’s prolonged assertion in response to this Wednesday’s debate begins with 22 factors (see associated information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Aroca issued an announcement that it was “compelled to name the GNR on the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to minimize the padlock that restricts entry to the municipal infrastructure parking”, the parking which can be used as a car parking zone for the Feira das Colheitas.

According to town council, these chargeable for Aroka had already “threatened” to lock the gates of the stadium, stopping entry, if the municipality didn’t do some essential work, and this risk was carried out. A state of affairs worthy of “sturdy rejection” by the City Council, which gives clarification on the stadium’s lease settlement within the closing a part of the identical assertion.

Now Arauca says town council’s communication “willfully distorts the details recorded therein as a result of it impugns and impugns the competence and pondering of the leaders of FC Arauca”.

“We are in opposition to our will, obliged to seem earlier than the general public to make clear the reality of the details”, may be learn within the observe, which remembers that “though the possession of the stadium belongs to the municipality, it’s not in full possession. The rights of the proprietor, being burdened with the best of use of the membership».

Arauca additionally accuses the municipality of a “lack of communication”, making a chronology of occasions and explaining the explanations for it, and additionally questions the calls for for works talked about within the metropolis council’s communication.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our outrage on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality.”

Aroka’s assertion

Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda grew to become conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the details recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable issues and accusations of benefit. And the ideas of FC Arouca leaders.

Thus, in opposition to our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the general public to clarify the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the best to use the municipal stadium and its integral elements that embody the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in drive and our obligations are all up to date.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted the usage of the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was said within the failed communication, though the municipality owns it, it’s not in absolute possession. The rights are the identical as the best of use of the membership (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, underneath the phrases and situations outlined within the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can’t impose its use with out a minimum of communication or session with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that it might arrange a live performance within the premises of the stadium, with out making certain the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the bogs and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be attainable due to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of knowledgeable nature. of the Portuguese League.

9 – We had been shocked that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the placement of the occasion, however we had been all the time positive that frequent sense would prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the sport between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , that means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the corporate in query acknowledged the validity of our issues and refused to set the stage on the eve of a excessive-danger sport.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that the usage of the stadium for live shows will intrude with the conventional coaching and planning of the skilled soccer crew, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nonetheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of certainly, if he had thought of our soccer membership and its leaders, this example would certainly have occurred. did not occur

14 – In that assembly, we defined unequivocally and clearly, all the time in good religion, the the reason why we weren’t allowed to maintain the occasion within the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality has acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental results of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we grew to become conscious of a change within the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It so occurs that we’re as soon as once more shocked by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality on the aim of utilizing the stadium’s automobile park, ignoring the issues and wants already expressed by the membership, and disregarding the phrases of the switch settlement. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, not appropriate with its use as a parking lot, additionally ignoring the disturbances and conflicts attributable to this use in already deliberate coaching and video games. .

19 – We have our mayors nearly as good folks, who comply with the legislation and the obligations assumed within the contracts, and now we have all the time defended the necessity for the dwelling forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, now we have tried many occasions to get the help of the municipality within the essential investments and enhancements within the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), all the time with a destructive response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up funds works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, underneath the phrases of the task contract, underneath the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being certain to adjust to it, can’t impose or get rid of the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to get rid of the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas in regards to the appropriateness and respect for the perspective of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the vast majority of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In truth, FC Arouca is immediately a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive strategy to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced so much to its city, primarily due to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted sources. which has no help from the municipality.

Being good folks, respecting and abiding by the legislation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality, which culminated on this dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as somewhat democratic spirit and frequent sense would have sufficed for the entire thing. Situations to keep away from.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans benefit from the Harvest Fair to the very best of their potential.

Leaders ‘say’

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.