The Ball – Arouka responds to Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian perspective” (Arouka)

“Football Club de Aroca, SDUQ LDA was conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Aroca with shock and anger.” Arauca’s prolonged assertion in response to this Wednesday’s debate begins with 22 factors (see associated information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Aroca issued an announcement that it was “compelled to name the GNR on the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to lower the padlock that restricts entry to the municipal infrastructure parking”, the parking which will probably be used as a parking zone for the Feira das Colheitas.

According to the town council, these accountable for Aroka had already “threatened” to lock the gates of the stadium, stopping entry, if the municipality didn’t full sure mandatory duties, and this menace was carried out. A state of affairs worthy of “sturdy rejection” by the City Council, which offers clarification on the stadium’s lease settlement within the ultimate a part of the identical assertion.

Now Arauca says the town council’s communication “willfully distorts the details recorded therein as a result of it impugns and impugns the competence and considering of the leaders of FC Arauca”.

“We are towards our will, compelled to seem earlier than the general public to make clear the reality of the details”, the notice can even learn, which remembers that “though the stadium is owned by the municipality, it’s not in full possession. The rights of the proprietor, with the proper of use of the membership, are encumbered» .

Arauca additionally accuses the municipality of a “lack of communication”, making a chronology of occasions and explaining the explanations for it, and additionally questions the calls for for works talked about within the metropolis council’s communication.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our outrage on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality.”

Aroka’s assertion

Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda turned conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the details recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable concerns and accusations of advantage. And the ideas of FC Aroka leaders.

Thus, towards our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the general public to clarify the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the proper to use the municipal stadium and its integral elements that embrace the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in pressure and our obligations are all up to date.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted the usage of the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was acknowledged within the failed communication, regardless of the possession of the municipality, it’s not in full possession of the proprietor’s rights, being encumbered. With proper of use of Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, beneath the phrases and circumstances outlined within the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can’t impose its use with out not less than communication or session with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures should be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that it might manage a live performance within the premises of the stadium, with out guaranteeing the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the bogs and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be potential due to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of knowledgeable nature. of the Portuguese League.

9 – We have been shocked that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the situation of the occasion, however we have been at all times certain that frequent sense would prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the sport between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , which means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the corporate in query acknowledged the validity of our issues and refused to set the stage on the eve of a excessive-threat sport.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that the usage of the stadium for live shows will intervene with the conventional coaching and planning of the skilled soccer workforce, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nevertheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of certainly, if he had considered our soccer membership and its leaders, this example would certainly have occurred. did not occur

14 – In that assembly, we defined unequivocally and clearly, at all times in good religion, the the explanation why we weren’t allowed to maintain the occasion within the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality has acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental results of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we turned conscious of a change within the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It occurs that we’re as soon as once more shocked by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality with the goal of utilizing the stadium parking zone, ignoring the issues and wants already expressed by the membership. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, not appropriate with its use as a carpark, additionally ignoring the disturbances and conflicts attributable to this use in already deliberate coaching and video games. .

19 – We have our mayors nearly as good individuals, who comply with the regulation and the obligations assumed within the contracts, and we’ve at all times defended the necessity for the residing forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, we’ve tried many occasions to get the assist of the municipality within the mandatory investments and enhancements within the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), at all times with a destructive response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up finances works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, beneath the phrases of the project contract, beneath the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium project settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being certain to adjust to it, can’t impose or eliminate the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to eliminate the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas in regards to the appropriateness and respect for the perspective of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of nearly all of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In reality, FC Arouca is immediately a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive method to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced rather a lot to its city, primarily due to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted sources. which has no assist from the municipality.

Being good individuals, respecting and abiding by the regulation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation on the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian perspective of the municipality, which culminated within the dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as slightly democratic sense and frequent sense would have sufficed to keep away from this. The entire state of affairs.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans benefit from the Harvest Fair to one of the best of their potential.

Leaders ‘say’

.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.