The Ball – Arouka ‘throws himself’ into the chamber: “narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian angle” (Arouka)

“Football Club de Aroca, SDUQ LDA was conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Aroca with shock and anger.” Arauca’s prolonged assertion in response to this Wednesday’s debate begins with 22 factors (see associated information).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Aroca issued an announcement that it was “compelled to name the GNR at the Municipal Stadium”, which is its property, “to chop the padlock that restricts entry to the municipal infrastructure parking”, the parking which will likely be used as a car parking zone for the Feira das Colheitas.

According to the metropolis council, these accountable for Aroka had already “threatened” to lock the gates of the stadium, stopping entry, if the municipality didn’t full sure mandatory duties, and this menace was carried out. A state of affairs worthy of “sturdy rejection” by the City Council, which gives clarification on the stadium’s lease settlement in the remaining a part of the similar assertion.

Now Arauca says the metropolis council’s communication “willfully distorts the info recorded therein as a result of it impugns and impugns the competence and considering of the leaders of FC Arauca”.

“We are towards our will, compelled to seem earlier than the public to make clear the reality of the info”, the be aware may also learn, which recollects that “though the stadium is owned by the municipality, it isn’t in full possession. The rights of the proprietor, with the proper of use of the membership, are encumbered» .

Arauca additionally accuses the municipality of a “lack of communication”, making a chronology of occasions and explaining the causes for it, and additionally questions the calls for for works talked about in the metropolis council’s communication.

And the final a part of the assertion is especially harsh: “We reiterate our outrage at the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian angle of the municipality.”

Aroka’s assertion

Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda grew to become conscious of the content material of the assertion made immediately by the municipality of Arouca, as a result of it voluntarily distorts the info recorded there as a result of it makes objectionable issues and accusations of advantage. And the ideas of FC Aroka leaders.

Thus, towards our will, we’re obliged to seem earlier than the public to elucidate the reality of the matter.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the proper to make use of the municipal stadium and its integral components that embrace the parking space.

2 – In return, we pay a rental quantity for that use.

3- This Agreement is in power and our obligations are all updated.

4 – Thus, the municipality granted the use of the municipal stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca and, opposite to what was acknowledged in the failed communication, regardless of the possession of the municipality, it isn’t in full possession of the proprietor’s rights, being encumbered. With proper of use of Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t forestall the municipality from utilizing it for cultural, leisure and sports activities occasions, below the phrases and circumstances outlined in the lease settlement.

6 – A municipality can’t impose its use with out at the very least communication or session with its “tenants”, as a result of we’re in a democratic state the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The municipality restricted itself to informing FC Arouca, that it could manage a live performance in the premises of the stadium, with out making certain the supervision and safety of the premises, and with out permitting entry to the bogs and different services.

8 – Aroka promptly and in good religion knowledgeable the municipality that the switch of the venue wouldn’t be potential attributable to causes associated to safety and the planning of coaching and preparation video games contemplating our participation in a contest of knowledgeable nature. of the Portuguese League.

9 – We have been shocked that there was no communication from the municipality about altering the location of the occasion, however we have been at all times positive that frequent sense would prevail.

10 – However, on the eve of the recreation between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with none prior warning, an organization went to the stadium to arrange a live performance stage and the membership instantly confirmed its concern with safety points. , which means that followers visiting his set up and reception throughout video games could also be in danger.

11 – Fortunately, the firm in query acknowledged the validity of our considerations and refused to set the stage on the eve of a excessive-threat recreation.

12 – Once once more, we reiterate to the municipality that the use of the stadium for concert events will intervene with the regular coaching and planning of the skilled soccer staff, particularly since preparation video games are scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we managed a gathering with some representatives of the municipality, nonetheless, regretting that our Excellency the President was not current, as a result of certainly, if he had considered our soccer membership and its leaders, this example would certainly have occurred. did not occur

14 – In that assembly, we defined unequivocally and clearly, at all times in good religion, the explanation why we weren’t allowed to carry the occasion in the stadium.

15 – Convinced that the municipality has acknowledged the inconvenience and detrimental results of the occasion to the work and planning of the membership.

16 – Later, we grew to become conscious of a change in the live performance venue, which renewed our religion in our mayor’s frequent sense.

17 – It occurs that we’re as soon as once more shocked by the dictatorship imposed by the municipality with the purpose of utilizing the stadium car parking zone, ignoring the considerations and wants already expressed by the membership. Stadium.

18 – It can solely be utilized by the municipality for sporting, cultural or leisure occasions, not suitable with its use as a carpark, additionally ignoring the disturbances and conflicts brought on by this use in already deliberate coaching and video games. .

19 – We have our mayors pretty much as good individuals, who comply with the legislation and the obligations assumed in the contracts, and now we have at all times defended the want for the residing forces of the area to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, now we have tried many instances to get the help of the municipality in the mandatory investments and enhancements in the municipal stadium (imposed by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), at all times with a unfavorable response.

21 – In the final two years, the membership ended up finishing up price range works of greater than €100,000.00 by itself, below the phrases of the task contract, below the patronage of the municipality.

22 – Now, the stadium task settlement creates obligations for each events and the municipality, being certain to adjust to it, can’t impose or get rid of the stadium because it sees match, forgetting that it has no obligation to get rid of the stadium, being “leased”…

As for ideas about the appropriateness and respect for the angle of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that such unreasonable, unreasonable feedback and opposite to the opinion of the majority of Arouqueans, say extra about who makes them. than who they’re. full

In reality, FC Arouca is immediately a nationally and internationally famend membership for its distinctive method to skilled soccer competitions, which has introduced loads to its city, primarily attributable to its leaders and cautious administration with restricted assets. which has no help from the municipality.

Being good individuals, respecting and abiding by the legislation, not being any miscreants of the municipal or public treasury.

In view of the above, we reiterate our indignation at the narcissistic, pundit and authoritarian angle of the municipality, which culminated in the dialog to which we’re obliged to reply, as slightly democratic sense and frequent sense would have sufficed to keep away from this. The complete state of affairs.

Finally, we want to take this chance to want all Aroquans get pleasure from the Harvest Fair to the better of their capacity.

Leaders ‘say’


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.